To see where my own view-finding experiments led me, open up the Ch01_02_Views.skp file from the Exercise_Files folder, where the views that are available should match the screenshots that follow.

I eventually decided on six different views to produce my renders. Each one of them focuses on a different element or elements in the room, and each one of them employs one or more of the compositional rules listed earlier.

Another exercise you might want to try before going any further at this point would be to take down some notes regarding which of the previously listed compositional elements are visibly at work in each of the scene views that I have chosen here. The goal will be to develop your ability to observe and break down the compositional elements being used in any of the given images. Take your time to do this and then compare your own notes with the brief description that accompanies each of the scene view images.

Scene 1 makes use of a very specific focal point in the form of the circular window, using a somewhat unusual POV. The scene is given a sense of balance by placing both the window and corner of the room roughly on the vertical third lines, which of course helps us add to the figure's balance.

In Scene 2, the first deliberate choice made for the view was to use a wide shot for the POV. This lets us show everything in the room in one go, essentially making the environment itself a general focal point in the render.

We can also see both symmetry and balance at work. Both of these elements come about as a consequence of the initial choice for the POV. Looking straight down the center of the room gives us a natural sense of both symmetry and balance that hopefully feels unforced.

The fireplace and speakers both sit roughly on the lower horizontal third line, which helps draw our eyes to them naturally, creating a kind of secondary focal point that is a little more specific in nature. At the same time, having these elements placed around the lower third also adds to the sense of balance in the scene.

Our Scene 3 view makes use of a very specific focal point in the table, with the POV being deliberately chosen so as to give us the ability to create depth in the scene by means of foreground and background objects. The fact that this keeps the table placed on both the vertical and horizontal third lines reinforces its role as the main focal point.

Scene 4 gives us an unusual POV on the environment that, although a little gimmicky, is a device that can give an image a very unique feel when used well. In this instance, the choice of POV directly influences what we can use as a focal point in the scene, which becomes the fireplace and speakers in this case. We also, by default, get to make a good use of framing and depth as both are created automatically by the ceiling panels that we are sitting above.

Scene 5 is a deliberate attempt to make use of balance by forcing a diagonal line of visual interest through the image, starting at the table on the left, then travelling left to right through the speaker in the center, and on to the window in the upper right. The line you will notice travels through the vertical and horizontal thirds, creating visual connectivity. We also get a measure of depth in the shot as this POV gives us some natural foreground and background object separation.

Our sixth and final scene, Scene 6, is something I enjoy referring to as the cathedral shot. An extremely low POV causes everything in the scene to take on a presence that can make the viewer feel somewhat small and insignificant. By placing everything symmetrically in the view, we make use of framing to create a sense of balance that itself seems to add to the grandness of our view.

One final thing that we need to do before we leave composition behind is to make certain that our actual V-Ray renders match more closely with what we are currently seeing in the SketchUp viewport. It would be a shame to have worked hard to create a good composition in our camera view only to find that our render doesn't frame up in the same way. In fact, to show that currently our viewport and the V-Ray frame buffer renders are out of sync, let's take our first render.

If you don't already have the V-Ray toolbars present in the interface, now would be a good time to bring those up. To do that, let's perform the given steps:

To initiate a render in V-Ray, all that we need to do is hit the big R (for render) button on the main toolbar and V-Ray will begin to process the scene for us.

Once the render is complete, as you can see in the following screenshot, the framing we have in the V-Ray frame buffer window does not match that seen in the SketchUp viewport at all. This is because my SketchUp interface is currently set 1600 x 900 (currently giving us a viewport aspect ratio of 2.01:1), whereas V-Ray by default is rendering at 800 x 600 (which is a 1.333:1 ratio).

This obviously requires a bit of correction. To do that, we need to open up our V-Ray option editor by clicking on the O (for Option) button on the toolbar. Don't be intimidated by the sight of all the rollouts and parameters that confront us; we will become quite comfortable with these as we move through the various chapters in this book.

To align the framing of our renders a little more closely, let's perform the following steps:

To keep things moving along quickly, I am going to employ a good workflow practice and render at a reduced, low-end HD resolution of 853 x 480. This approach to the testing phase means that we can make broad revisions without having to wait for full quality renders to finish. On average, an image rendered at half resolution will be completed four times faster than a full resolution render, which is logical since only one-fourth of the overall rendered content is being produced.

While a good composition gives us a solid foundation on which to build a photographic render, if we try to render a scene that has no lighting, well let's just say the end results will fall quite a way short of those desired.

The brilliant thing about lighting a scene with V-Ray in SketchUp is that a complete day-lighting system that consists of both the Sun and Sky elements is, by default, set up and ready to render with as soon as we start creating geometry in the scene. For newer users, this can obviously help tremendously when it comes to getting up and running with the software.

Controlling the placement of the Sun is extremely easy as we simply need to make use of SketchUp's built-in shadow controls, wherein we set the month of the year along with the time of day and time zone, and then we can render. What we instantly get is natural-looking daylight without having to do anything at all!

Better still is the fact that V-Ray also sets up a basic indirect (or global) illumination system for us automatically. This means we can even render interior Arch Viz shots right out of the box without having to do any extra set up work beyond, of course, getting our geometry created and then positioned in the scene.

To look at the kind of renders we can get from V-Ray without doing any real lighting setup at all, either continue to work with your current scene or open up the Ch01_03_Lighting.skp file from your Exercise_Files folder, if you prefer to work with the same scene as I will be using.

The scene or camera angle we are using here (Scene 2) has been deliberately chosen to help us properly evaluate the quality and level of lighting that we are getting in our scene. It can do this because it affords us a full view of the environment.

With our camera view set to Scene 2, let's take a render by clicking the render button on the V-Ray toolbar. Once the initial translation phase is complete, V-Ray opens up its own frame buffer window and starts the rendering phase.

The first activity we see in the frame buffer window will be V-Ray's indirect illumination calculations. First of all, the light cache and then the irradiance mapping engines calculate the level of illumination and light bounce requirements for the scene. This is based on the parameters set up in the V-Ray option editor and the materials applied through the materials editor.

The final part of this process is the rendering of the image itself. In this instance, what we get, as we no doubt could discern from the GI calculations, is way too dark for the type of bright and airy feel in the interior that we are looking for. This brings us to a critical aspect of lighting in V-Ray, exposure!

Another default aspect of the V-Ray setup in SketchUp is that it makes use of a physical camera model for rendering. This means that real-world parameters such as shutter speed, F numbers (or F stops), and ISO (or film speed) values are used to control various aspects of the render, such as exposure, motion blur, and depth of field.

Basically, if we understand how to control these elements on a real-world camera, be it film or digital, then we already have a big head start when it comes to rendering using the V-Ray physical camera model. To access the physical camera controls, we need to revisit the V-Ray toolbar and click on the option editor button once more.

Then, if we open the Camera rollout, you can see in the following screenshot that we now have access to a wealth of camera controls and parameters. As we have already noted that our render is quite a bit darker than desired, the controls we are interested in would be those capable of affecting the exposure levels, which would be as follows:

As a general rule, I prefer to handle exposure levels using only the film speed value as much as I possibly can. This is due to the fact that it is the only one of the three controls in what is often referred to as the exposure triangle that isn't used to control some other aspect of the physical camera model. Shutter speed is also used to control motion blur while the F number (or F stop) value will typically be the control mechanism for any Depth of Field (DOF) effects in our render.

To get some nice brightness levels in this instance, let's adjust the film speed or ISO value and set it to 1200. Taking another render by hitting the render button on the far right of the V-Ray frame buffer's top toolbar will show us that our illumination levels are now much more appropriate for the bright, airy feel we want to create.

The next aspect of our lighting setup that needs a little attention is the quality of the indirect illumination solution. At this moment, we can see quite a bit of dark splotching on our nice clean geometry. This often happens when we work with scenes that present a little bit of a challenge to the indirect illumination engines, which, of course, interiors nearly always do. Couple this with the reasonably low-quality default settings that V-Ray sets up, and we get splotches or noise patches in our render.

To clean this up a little, let's perform the following steps:

If we take another render by hitting the button on the toolbar, we should see a marked improvement in the level of splotchiness present in the image; not that every trace of it will be gone, mind you. When working with interior scenes, creating completely noise-free Global Illumination (GI) renders can prove to be quite costly in terms of the time it takes to render the final image.

What we often have to aim for then is a situation that would generally be considered free enough of noise to be called an acceptable final solution. One reason why we can often get away with this is the fact that once materials get applied to the geometry, any slight levels of splotchiness still found in the scene tend to oftentimes just blend into the materials themselves.