第187章

[49] Archives nationales， H， 1463 (a letter by M. de Fontette， November 16， 1772). - Cf. Cochut， "Revue des Deux Mondes，"September， 1848. The sale of the national property seems not to have sensibly increased small properties nor sensibly diminished the number of the large ones. The Revolution developed moderate sized properties.

In 1848， the large estates numbered 183，000 (23，000 families paying 300 francs taxes， and more， and possessing on the average 260 hectares of land， and 160，000 families paying from 230 to 500 francs taxes and possessing on the average 75 hectares.) These 183，000 families possessed 18，000，000 hectares. - There are besides 700，000 medium sized estates (paying from 50 to 250 francs tax)， and comprising 15，000，000 hectares. - And finally 3，900，000 small properties comprising 15，000，000 hectares (900，000 paying from 25 to 50 francs tax， averaging five and one-half hectares each， and 3，000，000 paying less than 25 francs， averaging three and one ninth hectares each). -According to the partial statement of de Tocqueville the number of holders of real property had increased， on the average， to five-twelfths； the population， at the same time， having increased five-thirteenths (from 26 to 36 millions).

[50] "Compte-général des revenus et dépenses fixes au 1er Mai， 1789(Imprimerie Royale， 1789). - De Luynes， XVI. 49. - Roux and Buchez， I.

206， 374. (This relates only to the countries of election； in the provinces， with assemblies， the increase is no less great). Archives nationales， H2， 1610 (the parish of Bourget， in Anjou). Extracts from the taille rolls of three métayer- farms belonging to M. de Ruillé.

The taxes in 1762 are 334 livres， 3 sous； in 1783， 372 livres， 15sous.

CHAPTER II. TAXATION THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF MISERY.

I. EXTORTION.

Direct taxes. - State of different domains at the end of the reign of Louis XV. - Levies of the tithe and the owner. - What remains to the proprietor.

Let us closely examine the extortions he has to endure， which are very great， much beyond any that we can imagine. Economists had long prepared the budget of a farm and shown by statistics the excess of charges with which the cultivator is overwhelmed. If he continues to cultivate， they say， he must have his share in the crops， an inviolable portion， equal to one-half of the entire production， and from which nothing can be deducted without ruining him. This portion， in short， accurately represents， and not a sou too much， in the first place， the interest of the capital first expended on the farm in cattle， furniture， and implements of husbandry； in the second place， the maintenance of this capital， every year depreciated by wear and tear； in the third place， the advances made during the current year for seed， wages， and food for men and animals； and， in the last place， the compensation due him for the risks he takes and his losses. Here is a first lien which must be satisfied beforehand， taking precedence of all others， superior to that of the seignior， to that of the tithe-owner (décimateur)， to even that of the king， for it is an indebtedness due to the soil.[1] After this is paid back， then， and only then， that which remains， the net product， can be touched. Now， in the then state of agriculture， the tithe-owner and the king appropriate one-half of this net product， when the estate is large， and the whole， if the estate is a small one[2]. A certain large farm in Picardy， worth to its owner 3，600 livres， pays 1，800 livres to the king， and 1，311 livres to the tithe owner； another， in the Soissonnais， rented for 4，500 livres， pays 2，200 livres taxes and more than 1，000 livres to the tithes. An ordinary métayer-farm near Nevers pays into the treasury 138 livres， 121 livres to the church， and 114livres to the proprietor. On another， in Poitou， the fisc (tax authorities) absorbs 348 livres， and the proprietor receives only 238.

In general， in the regions of large farms， the proprietor obtains ten livres the arpent if the cultivation is very good， and three livres when ordinary. In the regions of small farms， and of the métayer system， he gets fifteen sous the arpent， eight sous and even six sous.

The entire net profit may be said to go to the church and into the State treasury.

Hired labor， meantime， is no less costly. On this métayer-farm in Poitou， which brings in eight sous the arpent， thirty-six laborers consume each twenty-six francs per annum in rye， two francs respectively in vegetables， oil and milk preparations， and two francs ten sous in pork， amounting to a sum total， each year， for each person， of sixteen pounds of meat at an expense of thirty-six francs.